There are many individuals of all identities and foundations who submit applications for traveler visas at the US Consulate in the Realm of land. Despite the fact that such applications are to some degree normal, an ever increasing number of they are being dependent upon disavowal compliant with segment 214b of the US Migration and Identity Act. This standard requires Consular Officials to make an assumption that the vacationer visa candidate is really an undisclosed foreigner except if the visa candidate cans areas of strength for show that goes against and consequently disproves this assumption. Segment 214b consequently makes areas of strength for a versus powerless ties investigation which requires that the candidate show solid ties to their nation of beginning, or one more country beyond the US of America, and furthermore feeble ties to the US. This can be an exceptionally risky arrangement particularly for those s who wish to take a critical other back to the US for a brief stay.
The presence of a Resident sweetheart or sweetheart can be exceptionally negative for a Public’s B-2 visa application or any non-migrant visa application so far as that is concerned including the F-1 visa, J-1 visa, B-1 visa, and so on. The disservice emerges from the way that the candidate has a relationship and hence could be interpreted to have areas of strength for a USA. This is certainly not a savvy game-plan, in this creator’s perspective, on the grounds that any deception, even distortion by exclusion, is unscrupulous and could be seen by State Office faculty as an endeavor to dupe the government. For an Resident, a finding of extortion and deception could prompt punishments, however such a finding could have a profoundly adverse consequence upon the candidate’s opportunities to at any point get a US Dich vu visa in the future as extortion and distortion is viewed as a legitimate grounds of prohibition to the USA that would likely just be helped upon the endorsement of an I-601 waiver.
The structure then permits the candidate to note family connections, including life partner/fiance. The justification for this conversation is because of the way that the rest of the structure’s inquiries can be responded to moderately without any problem. It is this conviction that in the event that the candidate has a close connection with an Resident, this reality should be unveiled to the Consular Official either recorded as a hard copy or during the visa interview, yet assuming there is any likelihood that marriage and change of status might be plausible, then, at that point, it would be smarter to swear off an effort to get a traveler visa, as this is not exactly the legitimate visa, and present a request for a US life partner visa.